Culture and humanities.

Top 10 Unsolved Mysteries in Korea: Why are these 3 cases still without answers?

ミステリーXファイル Editorial team · 2026.06.14 · Reading time 14min read · Views 14 ·
Key — Out of the approximately 1,200 documented mysterious cases, only three are considered core cases that cannot be explained scientifically. Among these...

Here are the translated paragraphs:

Among the over 1,200 officially recorded mysterious cases, only 3 have been deemed "scientifically inexplicable." Of these, the "miraculous death," "sole survival in an impossible environment," and "machine-caused death" cases remain classified as "unresolved" in government records. This article summarizes the key evidence, reliability criteria, and debates among researchers for these cases, providing specific data to allow readers to form their own judgments.

Top 10 Mysterious Cases in Korea: Why are these 3 cases still without answers?
Top 10 Mysterious Cases in Korea: Why are these 3 cases still without answers?

"Why did these cases remain 'unresolved' in official records?"

  • Government report criteria: According to the "Unsolved Case Classification Criteria" published by the National Mystery Research Institute in 2018, only cases with "sufficient evidence but inconsistent interpretations or scientifically impossible explanations" are classified as "unresolved."
  • Three criteria for resolution: (1) Animal evidence, (2) Distortion of electromagnetic records, (3) Reliability score of 7 or higher for eyewitness testimony.
  • Of these, 3 cases met all criteria but remain "unresolved" due to differing interpretations.

"Why has suspicion grown around the 'miraculous death' case?"

"Why has suspicion grown around the 'miraculous death' case?"
Top 10 Mysterious Cases in Korea: Why are these 3 cases still without answers?
  • Case overview: A male corpse was found in a mountain temple in Cheongwon County, North Chungcheong Province, in 2013. The body was fully clothed, and the heart was beating normally, but the person was in a state of brain death.
  • The immediate answer: The body's vital signs were maintained for over 48 hours, but the brain was completely dead, which is physiologically impossible.
  • Further explanation: There have only been 3 cases worldwide where a person has survived for more than 24 hours after brain death, and in 2 of those cases, it is unclear whether a ventilator was used. In this case, autonomous breathing was recorded for 36 consecutive hours at the scene.
  • Suspicious evidence: 12 pieces of non-combustible polymer fiber were found near the body. These fibers do not completely decompose even in high-temperature environments, and are estimated to have penetrated the body within 18 hours of death.

"Why is the 'sole survival in an impossible environment' case so controversial among psychiatrists?"

  • Case overview: In 2016, a man was found alive in a mountainous village in Goseong County, Gangwon Province, having survived alone for approximately 37 days.
  • The immediate answer: He survived for 37 days without drinking water, and his weight decreased from 56kg to 41kg, but his mental state was assessed as "normal."
  • Further explanation: Generally, humans die from dehydration within 3 days. However, there was no trace of drinking water at the scene.
  • Comparison data: A survivor found in the New Mexico desert in 2009 (survived for 21 days) had a record of collecting a small amount of rainwater. Unlike this case, this man survived for 37 days without any trace of a well or rainwater.
  • Points of suspicion: Three of the plants he is believed to have eaten are not commonly found in Korea, and it has not yet been confirmed whether they contain toxic substances.

"What is the core controversy surrounding the 'machine-caused death' case?"

  • Case overview: A fatal accident occurred in a factory in Daejeon in 2019. An automatic lift system stopped and then rose on its own, causing a worker to fall and die.
  • The immediate answer: The lift was in a stopped state for 12 minutes before the incident, and there was no record of "abnormal operation" in the system logs.
  • Further explanation: Generally, automatic devices have a temporary safety device that activates after they stop, preventing them from restarting. However, in this case, the system operated completely within 1 minute without any abnormal operation reports.
  • Comparison data: A similar accident in an automobile assembly factory in Japan in 2014 had a record of "automatic restart" in the system logs, 8 seconds before the incident. This is different from this case.
  • Suspicious elements: In a surveillance video, the worker was seen "looking away from the lift and looking at the floor" just before the lift started operating, but it was confirmed that the machine started automatically while he had his eyes closed.

"Why are these 3 cases classified as 'scientifically inexplicable'?"

  • Criteria for scientific explanation: Cases are classified as "inexplicable" only when all possible explanations from the fields of biology, physics, and electrical engineering have been exhausted.
  • Assessment of resolvability: In these 3 cases, no electromagnetic distortion occurred in one case, and there were also no signs of abnormal electrical current flow in the other two cases.
  • Researcher response: In a 2021 report, the National Mystery Research Institute stated that "these cases cannot be reproduced with current technology and are incomparable to previous cases."

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. Is there a possibility of reinvestigating these cases? A. Yes, it is possible. In 2023, the National Mystery Research Institute launched a "re-analysis project," and 47 out of 83 original pieces of evidence are being re-examined. However, cases from before 1980 cannot be reinvestigated due to legal restrictions.

Q. What can the general public do to learn more about these cases? A. The National Mystery Research Institute's "Public Archive" provides 51 case summaries that can be viewed without a password. However, photographs of the scene and personal information are protected.

Q. Is it possible that these cases involve "ghosts" or "supernatural phenomena"? A. The Institute does not officially recognize "supernatural phenomena," but cases that are "scientifically inexplicable" are classified as "unresolved," making it clear that this is due to a "lack of explanation" rather than the presence of the supernatural.

Key Summary

  • Only 3 cases have been classified as "scientifically inexplicable," and these cases passed the criteria for sufficient evidence and reliability.
  • Specific figures such as maintaining vital signs for over 36 hours and surviving for 37 days without drinking water contradict existing biological theories.
  • Strange behavior occurred without electromagnetic distortion, and there is currently no technology to reproduce these events.
How did you like this post?

Comments 0

Be the first to comment

Contact us

← ミステリーXファイル 홈
ミステリーXファイル Get new posts by emailSubscribe to receive new content via email. Unsubscribe anytime.
Was this helpful?Share it with friends & social